On the Difference Between False–and Real–Flags of Compassion

Phyllis Beveridge Nissila

On the False Flag  of Compassion

I heard the following new political expression the other day: “false flag of compassion.” It is an extension of the traditional term “false flag,” which means “a covert operation designed to deceive; the deception creates the appearance of a particular party, group, or nation being responsible for some activity, disguising the actual source of responsibility.”

The new term incorporates the politicization of compassion, i.e., the appearance-only of genuine caring and empathy that is presented to similarly obscure the real motive or intent of some person, operation, or political agenda.

For example, it is a false flag of compassion to claim that all illegal aliens are victims of persecution in their own countries and few, if any at all, traffic in drugs, arms, human beings, or are an invading fifth column.

For another not-so-new example is the way abortion on demand, that now includes infanticide, is advertised as only compassion for women’s rights. It has even been renamed “pro-choice.” Thus, the focus is shifted to the mother’s right to decide whether or not to allow her baby to live, while there is no compassion extended to the baby to be aborted (and in some pretty brutal ways, particularly in the second and third trimesters, and now during and after birth as well*)…

A false flag of compassion is in reality a logical fallacy called “appeal to pity” and is designed to shift the focus away from real motives and realities which may be far different than anybody with genuine empathy would want.

The compassion part of the new term is very effective, though, in part because of another relatively new term, “virtue signaling,” whereby a person will present “public, empty gestures intended to convey socially approved attitude(s) without any associated risk or sacrifice”[1]. He or she becomes, as it were, a “champagne socialist” (like an “armchair quarterback”).

Virtue signaling is a diversionary tactic that works on both the signaler and those who believe this feigned morality. Meanwhile, behind the scenes, those knowingly employing the appeal to pity take full advantage of both the signalers and the genuinely concerned in order to accomplish covert political goals.

This (false) compassion combo of virtue signaling and all-talk-but-little-action also  works to shame the opposition (those who comprehend what is really going on) into silence.

But it’s a good con game because, well, who wants to be thought of as morally inferior? Insensitive? Non compassionate?

Who wants to be publicly or even privately shamed?

Plus, what with the thought- and speech-stopping, Political Correctness movement, these days, who wants to suffer the rage of the political con artists who often employ tactics of personal destruction to shut down the voice of opposition, tactics that are getting more dangerous as time goes on?

But a psychological operation can only go on for so long until the real operation becomes blatantly apparent–at least apparent to those who get their news from more than one (conglomerate or single) source and who do the research. And truth spreads fast.

But even as there is a powerful “real” for every counterfeit, there are also real flags of compassion where actions match words, problems get solved, and/or dangers are avoided.

In spiritual history, there is an excellent illustration of this in the biblical story of Abraham that not only shows one man’s genuine concern for the inhabitants of his city, though few inhabitants there were deemed righteous, but also God’s compassion, His patience in responding even though there was compelling cause for justice now. As 2 Peter 3:9 reads: “The Lord is not slow about His promise, as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing for any to perish but for all to come to repentance.” (NASB).

The story, detailed in Genesis chapters 18 and 19, reads as follows.

On the Real Flag of Compassion…

From Chapter 18:

16 When the men** got up to leave, they looked down toward Sodom, and Abraham walked along with them to see them on their way. 

17 Then the LORD said, “Shall I hide from Abraham what I am about to do? 

18 Abraham will surely become a great and powerful nation, and all nations on earth will be blessed through him. 

19 For I have chosen him, so that he will direct his children and his household after him to keep the way of the LORD by doing what is right and just, so that the LORD will bring about for Abraham what he has promised him.” 

20 Then the LORD said, “The outcry against Sodom and Gomorrah is so great and their sin so grievous 

21 that I will go down and see if what they have done is as bad as the outcry that has reached me. If not, I will know.”

22 The men turned away and went toward Sodom, but Abraham remained standing before the LORD. 

23 Then Abraham approached him and said: “Will you sweep away the righteous with the wicked? 

24 What if there are fifty righteous people in the city? Will you really sweep it away and not spare the place for the sake of the fifty righteous people in it? 

25 Far be it from you to do such a thing—to kill the righteous with the wicked, treating the righteous and the wicked alike. Far be it from you! Will not the Judge of all the earth do right?” 

26 The LORD said, “If I find fifty righteous people in the city of Sodom, I will spare the whole place for their sake.” 

27 Then Abraham spoke up again: “Now that I have been so bold as to speak to the Lord, though I am nothing but dust and ashes, 

28 what if the number of the righteous is five less than fifty? Will you destroy the whole city for lack of five people?” “If I find forty-five there,” he said, “I will not destroy it.” 

29 Once again he spoke to him, “What if only forty are found there?” He said, “For the sake of forty, I will not do it.” 

30 Then he said, “May the Lord not be angry, but let me speak. What if only thirty can be found there?” He answered, “I will not do it if I find thirty there.”

31 Abraham said, “Now that I have been so bold as to speak to the Lord, what if only twenty can be found there?” He said, “For the sake of twenty, I will not destroy it.” 

32 Then he said, “May the Lord not be angry, but let me speak just once more. What if only ten can be found there?” He answered, “For the sake of ten, I will not destroy it.”

33 When the LORD had finished speaking with Abraham, he left, and Abraham returned home.

Chapter 19 details the eventual destruction of the city, Abraham’s nephew Lot and his family the only ones saved.

..and Three Very Important Differences Between False and Real Flags of Compassion

The big differences between false and real flags of compassion are as follows.

  1. False compassion is manipulative and passive and, at worst, is used to get away with murder, figuratively and literally. Real compassion, on the other hand, is genuine as well as active and kind. Here are several biblical examples. Contemporary examples abound as well.
  2. False compassion can be ill-advised and go on for too long–or stop too short. It can be signaled, but it is not sincere. Real compassion recognizes “enough is enough.” There is a time, after having extended one’s peace but it is not received, to “shake the dust off one’s feet” and leave.
  3. False compassion stops when its ulterior motives and objectives are achieved, when the ruse is complete. Real compassion is patient, as illustrated in the ancient story of Abraham’s intercession for Sodom and its twin city and God’s response, and in the other biblical examples cited above. Real compassion is also illustrated today when, say, a mother now mourns the loss of that little one, a “choice” she made during a time of fear or ignorance or perhaps pressured by outside political or social forces. And she sees the hope, perhaps for the first time, in that real compassion offered by God for those who choose to yield to His love.

For every real there is a counterfeit; for every choice, a consequence.

For every damaged mind, heart, and/or body, there is hope for salvation, healing, and restoration by putting faith and trust in Jesus Christ, Who did not hold back in the most compassionate act of all.

On the cross.

That day and for all time.

For you and for me.

May I encourage you, today, to choose the real.

~~~~~

[1]Hobbs, Julia (17 February 2017). “What Is Virtue Signalling? And Should We Feel Bad About Doing It?”Vogue (UK edition). Retrieved 26 February 2019.

*In the law recently passed in New York City regarding “unsuccessful abortions,” meaning the baby survives the (attempted) abortion, it is now okay to withhold medical care after birth and let the baby die from neglect. Other states are lining up to follow suit.

Another at-birth method of killing a baby, deemed “partial birth abortion,” involves active extermination by “delivering a healthy baby alive then killing it by crushing its skull and suctioning out the brain as it emerges from the womb.”

**Bible scholars indicate both the angelic nature of the men referenced in the narrative, and that one of them is Yahweh, Himself. See here for a relevant commentary. The story picks up after the visitors have prophesied to Abraham and Sarah, both old, now, and she past child bearing age, that in a year they will have a child.

 

This entry was posted in Commentaries, most recent posts and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to On the Difference Between False–and Real–Flags of Compassion

  1. When God is abandoned, the concept of transcendence is replaced by all manner of human enterprise. Philosophy, psychology and politics become gods to whom deference is given in full measure. Blind ideology replaces sublime divinity. In short, man replaces God with himself, so the result is a multitude of demi-gods who claim to have found the Answer, to have devised solutions to eternal ills, how society is to be ordered, how we are to conduct the minutiae of our lives, what we are to eat, what causes we should concern ourselves with.

    But humanism has its limitations. For every idea there is a counter-idea. The market-place for ideas is noisy and over-crowded. It is full of people eager to make a name for themselves, to be famous, even for a moment. They practise ‘virtue-signalling’ as a way to ellicit high popularity ratings. They regard themselves as contributing to human progress; they want the world to celebrate their ingenuity.

    The competition for fame is fierce. There exists a furious debate amongst those rival demi-gods and inevitably this descends into a shouting match. The rising crescendo of invective soon becomes undisciplined and vicious. Truth, as they each see it in their own minds, is soon abandoned and there ensues a meaningless and unreasoning battle of words. There are winners and losers, but even the winners’ sense of victory is short-lived. New ideas, new theories have entered the fray and tickle the ears of all who have embarked on a vain search for the truth, a humanistic and atheistic quest that will always end in disappointment.

    The real Truth emanates from God. It is through God that ‘we live and move and exist’….’We are all his children’ (Acts 17.28). With those quotations Paul was utilising the words of pagan philosophers who had alluded to an entity that could have seemed to them only a distant and undefined power. But we have Christ who manifested in human form the immanence of God. God has reached down to us to bring us closer to Him, to show us the Way to salvation and eternal life. Since God is the originator of Love, loving all His creation, we with our limited human perception can only stand in awe at the immensity his gifts – the gift of life and beneficence, the gift of nature, and the promises of future glory.

    For love to endure it feeds on compassion and mercy. For the human person to be held up as a unique and loved being, he or she requires that we all be concerned for one another, to nurture, to console and to comfort. Christ said to his disciples, ‘Let the little children come to me; do not stop them; for it is to such as these that the kingdom of God belongs’ (Mark 10.14).

    Therefore, if it is not the will of God to turn away any of His children but to redeem them, it is incumbent on mortal man to honour that which God has created in His own image. It is an abomination to deny love and compassion to those who are wholly dependent on the natural milk of human kindness, the instinctive love of a mother for the little child she has carried in her womb and who has now entered the world, living and breathing and in need of nourishment. This child has a right to his or her God-given destiny.

    If love and compassion are withdrawn from the human heart, then humanity is debased to a horrific degree. It is lowered to enduring sorrow. What can be known through word and spirit is now a matter of scorn. What is within reach of erring humanity to enlighten – the joy of knowing the Gospel of life – is supplanted by human pride of the worst kind, so that even the sanctity of life is shattered at the anvil of political expediency. A life without God is a life without meaning….and evil will abound.

    ‘Children, be on your guard against false gods’ (1 John 5.21).

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.